My story is just to thank Auto Trans Exppress, for keeping their words, despite earlier communication problems. At least, they got rid of a situation whereby a service provider disrupted the whole trust I had in U-ship.
Just imagine how the first service provider hijacked my van to his destination and used used the situation to extort money from me, because he thought I am a Chinese. Hartzogc1 was suppose to deliver this van on June 30, 2010, but chose to hijack it to a different location in Ohio, after picking it from Indiana. I got it from him after keeping it for over a month, a situation I was expecting Uship to assist me to track this guy down. The most astonishing part was when Uship told me I could not get my deposit to this guy back, because that payment was used to pay the guy's dues. Big insult to me, when I have reported that this guy did not deliver my picked item. Moreso, I paid extra money through Pay-pal to this provider for gas to deliver my van. I even reported he was demanding extra money from me, before he would release the van, and Uship kept adamant, and made me to pay new deposit to Auto Trans Express, which I still have to pay for their service on a new arrangement.
Now, my question is, why should Uship think I do not deserve to get my deposit to Hartzogc1 back? I need full explanation.
In my own view, if Uship insist on that, it means "Aiding and Abetting Crime", because what Hartzogc1 did was a crime, and Uship should not expect me to forfeit my deposit to him. Moreso, he took that advantage to collect money from me before he released the van to Auto Trans Express, which I have receipts from Pay-pal. This guy is a criminal, and I don't expect Uship to continue to register him as a service provider. Thanks, and awaiting your response. KGemini